meat beats miles

May 28, 2008 at 3:21 am Leave a comment

What you eat matters more than how many miles your Arugula has travelled. Several reports and one here say the same thing. Mindful consumption is getting simpler while it’s getting more complex. Talked about here and here. Resilience Science’s Gary Peterson asks whether intensive nature of a country’s agriculture changes the equation. The takeaway is transportation represents only 11% – on average, it depends on the food – of the total life-cycle GHG emissions of U.S. food (there’s little reason to expect a dramatically different result in Canada).

The results of this analysis show, Simon Donner points out, that for the average American household, “buying local” could achieve, at maximum, around a 4-5% reduction in GHG emissions due to large sources of both CO2 and non-CO2 emissions in the production of food. Shifting less than 1 day per week’s (i.e., 1/7 of total calories) consumption of red meat and/or dairy to other protein sources or a vegetable-based diet could have the same climate impact as buying all household food from local providers.


Entry filed under: biocomplexity. Tags: .

Chickens as early warning system Art , dump, circus

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


%d bloggers like this: